|
'The Golden Compass'
reviewed by Donna Scott
Before
going to see the film adaptation of Phillip Pullman’s
Northern Lights (The Golden Compass: US), I tried
to steer clear of all the discussion on the Internet –
not to avoid plot spoilers, but because I didn’t want
to be put off by the views of anyone who had read the book
as well and made disappointed comparisons, as often happens
with film adaptations of anything.
However, two seemingly contrary views still broke through
the defences: that the film was very dark for a children’s
film, but also very light, the plot prettied up for
a young and sensitive audience and stripped of many of the
book’s more complex and troubling proposals
concerning religion. So, a balance of dark and light then?
The plot of the film basically reflects that of the first
book: Lyra – a girl who lives under the care of her
uncle, Lord Asriel, in Jordan College, in the Oxford of a
world parallel to our own – overhears a plot to cover
up the discovery of ‘Dust’ in the far North. The
authoritarian grown-ups of her world – the Magisterium
– fear this Dust, but the children have something else
to be scared about – the ‘Gobblers’ who
have been kidnapping children off the streets. Then Lyra is
sent to stay with the beautiful and mysterious Mrs Coulter,
and her uncle presents her with the truth-telling alethiometer
– the ‘golden compass’ of the title –
which she is to keep secret.
When he began the project, the director, Chris Weitz, was
troubled by his inexperience with CGI. None of that trouble
is apparent in the film, which has stunning visuals from the
start and does justice to Pullman’s depictions of Lyra’s
Oxford. I am also pleased to say that there was no stinting
on the daemons – the creatures that are part of the
humans in Lyra’s world – which had concerned me
as they seemed to be conspicuously absent from trailer clips
that I’d seen beforehand.
Besides the very plausible graphics, the film has other strengths,
particularly in the performances of Nicole Kidman (Mrs Coulter)
and Dakota Blue Fanning (Lyra), whose manner of tough-talking
at the beginning may have seemed stilted to some, but was
exactly how I’d imagined her to speak. Their interaction
is perhaps brought into focus to the detriment of other characters
that aren’t afforded enough screen time to allow for
much development. In a film with a running time of just 113
minutes, I’m not sure how Weitz could have done otherwise.
However, he does make unnecessary use of Daniel Craig’s
association with James Bond with some lengthy long shots of
Lord Asriel being pursued through the snow.
The film could have made more of Lyra’s discomfort with
the way she is expected to behave around Oxford, and the curiosity
that stems from that… and yes, the discussion of religion
in the book has been somewhat simplified, but the value of questioning
authoritarian viewpoints against blind acceptance remains. The
end may be different from what the reader knows, but Weitz bowed
to the focus groups to make the film one whole, fairly upbeat
story. The result is a film that is not too long for kids to
sit through, and not half as dark or scary as the book, but
does the job of entertaining them with an enjoyable and enchanting
adventure story about a brave and clever girl who makes a very
sympathetic heroine. My advice – enjoy the film, kids,
but you may get more pleasure out of the book. |